## Why
The Bazel test coverage change exposed
`approved_folder_write_request_permissions_unblocks_later_apply_patch`,
and `rust-ci-full.yml` showed the same test failing on `main` on macOS.
There were two separate classes of problems here.
### Clean CI failure
The test emits an `apply_patch` tool call, but its config did not enable
the `apply_patch` tool, so the mocked response completed without an
`apply-patch-call` output. After enabling the tool, the same path also
needs the aggregate `codex-core` test binary to dispatch
`--codex-run-as-fs-helper`; sandboxed `apply_patch` uses that helper
under macOS Seatbelt.
The test now also canonicalizes the temporary patch target before
building the patch payload so the path matches normalized grants on
macOS, where `/var` paths often normalize to `/private/var`.
### Local/enterprise config isolation
The core test harness now builds its default test config with managed
config disabled, so host-managed enterprise config cannot alter these
tests. The request-permissions turns in this test also explicitly use
the user reviewer path, keeping the assertions focused on
`request_permissions` behavior rather than reviewer defaults from the
host.
## What Changed
- Enable `apply_patch` in
`approved_folder_write_request_permissions_unblocks_later_apply_patch`.
- Teach the core integration test binary to dispatch
`CODEX_FS_HELPER_ARG1`, matching the existing apply-patch and
linux-sandbox dispatch paths.
- Canonicalize the tempdir-backed patch target before creating the
patch.
- Ignore managed config in default core test configs and explicitly pin
this test to `ApprovalsReviewer::User`.
## Verification
Run outside the Codex app sandbox because these macOS tests
intentionally spawn Seatbelt:
- `cargo test -p codex-core
approved_folder_write_request_permissions_unblocks_later_apply_patch`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
approved_folder_write_request_permissions_unblocks_later_exec_without_sandbox_args`
Michael Bolin
229b40aa21