Rewrite DeclaredMembers to use stream ordering, so evaluation of subsequent comparators is lazy.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 347713768
This commit is contained in:
Sam Berlin
2020-12-15 16:14:02 -08:00
committed by Guice Team
parent 15ce8eb669
commit fd4ef5e6a3
@@ -15,82 +15,45 @@
*/
package com.google.inject.internal;
import com.google.common.collect.ComparisonChain;
import com.google.common.collect.Ordering;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Comparator;
/**
* Utility class for retrieving declared fields or methods in a particular order, because the JVM
* doesn't guarantee ordering for listing declared methods. We don't externally guarantee an
* ordering, but having a consistent ordering allows deterministic behavior and simpler tests.
*
* <p>For class ordering, within a single classloader there can only be one class with a given name,
* so we just compare the names.
*
* <p>For method ordering, within a single class it is sufficient to compare the non-generic method
* signature which consists of the name, return type and parameter types.
*/
public final class DeclaredMembers {
private DeclaredMembers() {}
public static Field[] getDeclaredFields(Class<?> type) {
Field[] fields = type.getDeclaredFields();
Arrays.sort(fields, FIELD_ORDERING);
return fields;
return Arrays.stream(type.getDeclaredFields())
.sorted(
Comparator.comparing(Field::getName)
.thenComparing(Field::getType, Comparator.comparing(Class::getName)))
.toArray(Field[]::new);
}
public static Method[] getDeclaredMethods(Class<?> type) {
Method[] methods = type.getDeclaredMethods();
Arrays.sort(methods, METHOD_ORDERING);
return methods;
return Arrays.stream(type.getDeclaredMethods())
.sorted(
Comparator.comparing(Method::getName)
.thenComparing(Method::getReturnType, Comparator.comparing(Class::getName))
.thenComparing(
method -> Arrays.asList(method.getParameterTypes()),
// TODO: use Comparators.lexicographical when it's not @Beta.
Ordering.<Class<?>>from(Comparator.comparing(Class::getName))
.lexicographical()))
.toArray(Method[]::new);
}
/**
* An ordering suitable for comparing two classes if they are loaded by the same classloader
*
* <p>Within a single classloader there can only be one class with a given name, so we just
* compare the names.
*/
private static final Ordering<Class<?>> CLASS_ORDERING =
new Ordering<Class<?>>() {
@Override
public int compare(Class<?> o1, Class<?> o2) {
return o1.getName().compareTo(o2.getName());
}
};
/**
* An ordering suitable for comparing two fields if they are owned by the same class.
*
* <p>Within a single class it is sufficent to compare the non-generic field signature which
* consists of the field name and type.
*/
private static final Ordering<Field> FIELD_ORDERING =
new Ordering<Field>() {
@Override
public int compare(Field left, Field right) {
return ComparisonChain.start()
.compare(left.getName(), right.getName())
.compare(left.getType(), right.getType(), CLASS_ORDERING)
.result();
}
};
/**
* An ordering suitable for comparing two methods if they are owned by the same class.
*
* <p>Within a single class it is sufficient to compare the non-generic method signature which
* consists of the name, return type and parameter types.
*/
private static final Ordering<Method> METHOD_ORDERING =
new Ordering<Method>() {
@Override
public int compare(Method left, Method right) {
return ComparisonChain.start()
.compare(left.getName(), right.getName())
.compare(left.getReturnType(), right.getReturnType(), CLASS_ORDERING)
.compare(
Arrays.asList(left.getParameterTypes()),
Arrays.asList(right.getParameterTypes()),
CLASS_ORDERING.lexicographical())
.result();
}
};
}